KONSTELLATION.AITalk to Us →
← Konstellation AI

AI Governance Diagnostic

A structured, independent assessment of how your AI systems actually behave under governance constraints. Not a framework review. Not a checklist. A technical evaluation.

Most organizations can't prove their AI is governed. The vendor says it's compliant, the framework boxes are ticked, and the actual enforcement is a text file the model is supposed to follow.

Vendor Self-ReportingNo independent verification of how decisions are actually made.
Checklist ComplianceBoxes ticked against NIST AI RMF or ISO 42001 without verifying controls are enforced in production.
“Trust the Prompt”Governance is a suggestion, not a constraint. No mechanism to verify adherence or detect drift.

Five domains

01

Governance Architecture

Is governance structured and machine-readable, or scattered across documents and tribal knowledge?

02

Enforcement Mechanism

Are rules enforced at runtime through deterministic controls, or is the AI simply asked nicely?

03

Evidence & Auditability

Can you trace a specific AI decision back to the rule that permitted or prohibited it?

04

Drift & Integrity

Can governance rules be modified without detection? Is there version control for the governance layer?

05

Coverage Gaps

Which AI-driven processes operate outside governance entirely?

How it works

Discovery

Stakeholder interviews, system inventory, documentation review. Who owns governance, what frameworks exist, where the concerns are.

Technical Assessment

Architecture analysis, runtime evaluation, evidence audit, adversarial scenarios. How governance actually behaves under pressure.

Synthesis

Scorecard, gap prioritization, remediation roadmap. The verdict: process fix or architecture problem.

What you get

Governance Posture Scorecard — quantified across all five domains

Architecture Map — how rules flow from documentation to runtime enforcement

Gap Analysis — prioritized findings where governance is absent or unverifiable

Remediation Roadmap — sequenced by risk severity with effort estimates

Executive Summary — board-ready narrative on governance maturity and liability exposure

The AI governance gap isn't one organization's problem. It's an ecosystem failure.

Regulated industries are deploying AI without the infrastructure to prove it's governed. The tools don't exist yet. The standards are immature. And the people making deployment decisions have no independent way to validate what they've been told.

This diagnostic is how we learn where the gaps are — across organizations, across industries. Every assessment sharpens our understanding of what needs to be built. That's the venture studio model: we don't guess at market needs. We diagnose them.

If your organization deploys AI in a regulated environment and can't answer how it's governed, we should talk.

Request a diagnostic →